Issue
I have a directory structure like this
dir1
one.c
two.c
dir2
three_main.c
four.c
I need to create a shared library libdir1.so
out of all c files in dir1
and an executable my_exe
out of all c files in dir2
along with the libdir1.so
I am creating the .so and the executable in two steps.
.so step1: gcc -c -fPIC -g -O2 -pthread -o one.o one.c
gcc -c -fPIC -g -O2 -pthread -o two.o two.c
.so step2: gcc -shared -g -O2 -pthread -o libdir1.so one.o two.o
exe step1: gcc -c -fPIE -o three_main.o three_main.c
gcc -c -fPIE -o four.o four.c
exe step2: gcc -Wall -g -L -ldir1 -o my_exe three_main.o four.o
Now my questions are....
- Should I use -fPIC and -fPIE in
step1
orstep2
or in both? - Can I use -fPIE in
step2
in creating the .so file? - Can I use -fPIC in
step1
in creating the executable? - How can I use RELRO compiler option in creating both .so and executable?
Thanks
Solution
Should I use -fPIC and -fPIE in step1 or step2 or in both?
No. The way you currently build the .so
and the binary is correct / optimal.
Can I use -fPIE in step2 in creating the .so file?
You could, but you shouldn't: -fPIE
is a compile-time option, and you are only linking in step2. If you pass -fPIE
to the link, it will be ignored.
Can I use -fPIC in step1 in creating the executable?
You could, but this will create sub-optimal code in the executable.
How can I use RELRO compiler option in creating both .so and executable?
Add -Wl,-z,relro
.
should I be using -z,now along with -Wl,-z,relro to be effective?
Yes: for maximum hardening, you should. -Wl,-z,relro
without -z,now
is not ineffective, but it is less effective. Details.
can I use relro for both binary and .so?
Yes.
Answered By - Employed Russian Answer Checked By - Dawn Plyler (WPSolving Volunteer)